Reading
Newbery Award Winning Books
Newbery Medal and Honor Books, 1922-1929
Newbery Medal and Honor Books, 1930-1939
Newbery Medal and Honor Books, 1940-1949
Newbery Medal and Honor Books, 1950-1959
Newbery Medal and Honor Books, 1960-1969
Newbery Medal and Honor Books, 1970-1979
Newbery Medal and Honor Books, 1980-1989
Newbery Medal and Honor Books, 1990-1999
Newbery Medal and Honor Books, 2000-2009
Time4Learning:
Reading Curriculum


Math
Time4Learning:
Math Curriculum

Practice Math Skills


Social Studies
The Underground History of Public Education by John Taylor Gatto


Science
52 Totally Awesome Science Experiments You Can Do At Home
Bigfoot Sightings

This site is dedicated to self-sufficient parents
who homeschool independently.



February 5, 2009

New Hampshire: Rep. Judith Day Seeks to Restrict Homeschoolers

The word is out – New Hampshire State Representative Judith Day seeks to further regulate homeschooling, making it a difficult, cumbersome and uncomfortable experience constrained by red tape regulations and fear.

This is the antithesis of independent homeschooling. Parents should be able to educate their children in freedom, with joy and inner peace. Being forced to comply with state regulations of paperwork, portfolios, public school oversight, and testing is not conducive to true home education.

Homeschooling is a form of private education. Public school officials should not be involved any more than they are involved with any private school.

Homeschooling teaches children to learn independently and with joy – by seeking information about topics that intrigue them. Forcing parents to “teach to the test” will not help children any more than the ill-conceived No Child Left Behind law does. Teaching to the test forces children into rote memorization of facts which interferes with true home education, intended to allow children to love learning because it is fun, mentally stimulating, and truly educational.

Here’s the text of the bill as it currently stands:

2009 SESSION

09-0491

04/05

HOUSE BILL 367

AN ACT relative to procedures for evaluation of home schooled students.

SPONSORS: Rep. J. Day, Rock 13

COMMITTEE: Education

ANALYSIS

This bill revises the procedures for evaluating a home education program.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -

Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.

Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]

Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.

09-0491

04/05

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Nine

AN ACT relative to procedures for evaluation of home schooled students.

Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:

1 Home Education; Records and Evaluation. Amend RSA 193-A:6 to read as follows:

193-A:6 Records; Evaluation.

I. The parent shall maintain a portfolio of records and materials relative to the home education program. The portfolio shall consist of a log which designates by title the reading materials used, and also samples of writings, worksheets, workbooks, or creative materials used or developed by the child. Such portfolio shall be preserved by the parent for 2 years from the date of the ending of the instruction. A credentialed educator shall review the portfolio at the end of the school year and shall submit a report of this review to the resident district superintendent or nonpublic school principal who shall retain such reports on file.

II. The parent shall provide for an annual educational evaluation [in which is documented the child’s demonstration of educational progress at a level commensurate with the child’s age and ability.] using the California Achievement Test, IOWA, or Stanford test of reading, writing, and mathematics. The evaluation shall be administered and monitored by a credentialed educator using standardized testing protocol. The evaluation shall not be administered or monitored by a parent. An alternative test which complies with the requirements of this paragraph may be used with the permission of the resident district superintendent or nonpublic school principal. The parent shall forward a copy of the evaluation results to resident district superintendent or nonpublic school principal. The superintendent or principal shall retain the test results on file. Under unusual circumstances, the superintendent or principal may grant a waiver to the testing requirement under this paragraph. [The child shall be deemed to have successfully completed his annual evaluation upon meeting the requirements of any one of the following:

(a) A certified teacher or a teacher currently teaching in a nonpublic school who is selected by the parent shall evaluate the child’s educational progress upon review of the portfolio and discussion with the parent or child. The teacher shall submit a written evaluation to the commissioner of education, resident district superintendent, or nonpublic school principal;

(b) The child shall take any national student achievement test, administered by a person who meets the qualifications established by the provider or publisher of the test. Composite results at or above the fortieth percentile on such tests shall be deemed reasonable academic proficiency. Such test results shall be reported to the commissioner of education, resident district superintendent, or nonpublic school principal;

(c) The child shall take a state student assessment test used by the resident district. Composite results at or above the fortieth percentile on such state test shall be deemed reasonable academic proficiency. Such test results shall be reported to the commissioner of education, the resident district superintendent, or nonpublic school principal; or

(d) The child shall be evaluated using any other valid measurement tool mutually agreed upon by the parent and the commissioner of education, resident district superintendent, or nonpublic school principal. The results shall be reported by the parent or the testing agency to such appropriate official.]

III.(a) The [commissioner of education,] resident district superintendent[,] or nonpublic school principal shall review the results of the annual educational evaluation of the child in a home education program as provided in paragraph II. [If the child does not demonstrate educational progress for age and ability at a level commensurate with his ability, the commissioner, superintendent, or principal shall notify the parent, in writing, that such progress has not been achieved.] In this section “educational progress” shall mean a child who, in the superintendent’s or principal’s judgment after reviewing the child’s portfolio and test scores on each area of the annual evaluation, has demonstrated satisfactory academic growth over the course of the school year.

(b) If the child is not demonstrating educational progress, the resident district superintendent or nonpublic school principal shall, no later than 30 days from the date of the annual educational evaluation, schedule a meeting with such child’s parent. The superintendent or principal and the parent shall review the results of the evaluation and determine a plan for remediation, including plans for addressing the child’s specific weaknesses. The remediation plan shall be completed no later than 60 days from the date of the meeting, and shall be reviewed by the superintendent or principal who shall attach a written response and comments to the plan. The superintendent or principal shall retain the plan and the attached response and comments on file.

(c) The parent shall have one year from the date of receipt of the written notification under subparagraph (a) to provide remedial instruction to the child. At the end of the one-year probationary period, the child shall be reevaluated in a manner as provided in this section. Continuation in a home education program shall be contingent upon the child demonstrating at the end of the probationary period educational progress [commensurate with his age and ability]. The parent of a child who fails to demonstrate such progress at the end of the probationary period shall meet with the resident district superintendent or nonpublic school principal to discuss the child’s home education program. At this meeting, the superintendent or principal shall decide whether the child’s home education program will be permitted to continue. If the home education program is terminated, the superintendent or principal shall notify [be notified by the commissioner that] the parent that he or she is entitled to a hearing as provided in RSA 193-A:7, I and II [and that the program will be terminated absent a finding for continuation pursuant to such hearing]. Upon a finding that the program should be terminated, the [child shall be reported by the] commissioner [or] of the department of education shall report the termination of the home education program to the resident district superintendent or nonpublic school principal [to the appropriate resident district superintendent,] who shall, if necessary, take appropriate action to ensure that compulsory attendance requirements are met.

IV. A parent aggrieved by a decision under this section may appeal the decision to the state board of education. The state board’s decision on such appeals shall be final.

2 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.

Source: HOUSE BILL 367 – AN ACT relative to procedures for evaluation of home schooled students.

To protest this bill, contact the New Hampshire House of Representatives Education Committee Members.

More articles on this bill:

HSLDA: Homeschool Freedom Under Fire in New Hampshire – “The current New Hampshire law is already more burdensome than most states.”

World Net Daily: Homeschoolers under attack – again! – “In New Hampshire, the existing law already is more burdensome than many other states, because in addition to an annual notice to school districts, homeschoolers must give an annual statement of academic progress and maintain two years’ of records.”

Free State Blogs: New Hampshire–Action Needed to Oppose Threatening Homeschool Legislation – ” Attend the February 10 meeting of the Home Education Advisory Council (”HEAC”). In attendance will be members of the House Education Committee and Members of the Department of Education. This will be a further opportunity to demonstrate opposition and concern about this unnecessary and radical change to New Hampshire’s homeschool law. The meeting will be held in Room 12 at the Department of Education located in the State Office Complex in Concord at 101 Pleasant Street.”

Christian Newswire: Homeschool Freedom Under Fire in New Hampshire – “Representative Judith Day is the sole sponsor of legislation that would radically rewrite the testing and assessment portion of the New Hampshire homeschool law.”

Filed under: Legislation, New Hampshire — LindaJoMartin @ 5:26 am




3 Comments »

  1. Performance is obviously not Mrs. Day’s motivation for this controlling piece of legislation. Homeschoolers are better educated than their government school counterparts all research has proven. Could it be “money” for the state? Or perhaps, religous discrimination? Hmm….

    Comment by Trina — February 5, 2009 @ 11:35 am




  2. Maybe she’s getting a kickback from some special interest group – such as a teacher’s union, or something like that.

    Comment by LindaJoMartin — February 6, 2009 @ 9:35 am




  3. Recently I witnessed a Manchester school meeting, I will not mention the name of the school being spoken of. Parents and teachers alike were stating that the middle school children were not required to write! I thought I was hearing things, but there was virtually no disagreement on that point. Now I am not a perfect homeschooling “teacher” but my children do write, a lot. Do they want us to take the chance…that the kids will end up in a school where much writing is required or little? Until they can guarantee WHAT they are requiring, why should any of us take that chance? Can I apply Judith Days standard to that particular English class? The old saying rings true…what is good for the goose is good for the gander! Laurie Levasseur

    Comment by laurie levasseur — February 25, 2009 @ 5:42 pm




RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

:: Blogmarks :: del.icio.us :: Digg it :: Furl :: ma.gnolia :: reddit :: Scuttle :: StumbleUpon :: Yahoo MyWeb ::

Leave a comment


RSS Blog Feed RSS Blog Feed
RSS Comments Feed RSS Comments Feed

Independent Homeschooling

Custom Search

del.icio.us del.icio.us

:: Blogmarks :: del.icio.us :: Digg it :: Furl :: ma.gnolia :: reddit :: Scuttle :: StumbleUpon :: Yahoo MyWeb ::

Add to Technorati Favorites

Web Design Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory




Independent Homeschooling © 2006-2010 Klamath Design